It's clear that the true essence of learning is more than just flipping through a PowerPoint and reading the information on the slide. To really create a learning environment, it all starts before the training begins.
At the top of my post there is a brief statement, "Information is a foundation that creates endless thoughts and practices for new learning". While writing this expression, it came from a thought that information we are exposed to provide the footing or base of our continued learning. If we think of a new born baby who sees the world for the first time, that baby takes in images which begins the learning process.
This probably doesn't complete the answer to the question, where does learning begin; but instead, it proposes that learning has a base and from there continued learning takes place. A great example would be math...at least from my personal experience. I'm not going to say that it's impossible to step into a calculus class without a foundation of mathematics, but it sure would be difficult to gain the concepts.
Interestingly a friend and I just had this exact conversation concerning math. Math never was my strength and as it was pointed out in our discussion, often times this can be due to the foundation of instruction when the subject was very first introduced. I prefer not to think of myself as non-teachable, so I accepted this suggestion.
So, the point of all this is my notion that initial learning needs to start with a solid foundation, or just like a house with cheap wood, it will crumble as the foundation continues to built upon. The learner who is taught with a cheap foundation will also fall behind as the subjects become more complex.
Michael,
ReplyDeleteMy instinct is to agree with you that you have to start with good fundamentals. But your thoughts inspired two threads for me:
# What part does experience play? How do you know, at the beginning, that you aren't getting good fundamentals? I've been programming since I was 12 and studying martial arts since I was 15. I like to think that I can easily evaluate a book on coding or a martial arts class. I believe that I should be able to tell fairly quickly whether the instructor is approaching the subject 'correctly'. But given the idiosyncratic nature of learning, am I evaluating 'fundamentals' or 'what works best first for me'?
## The other thought that occurred to me was to wonder whether putting an emphasis on ensuring that fundamentals are being supplied doesn't put you into a constrained psychological stance. Won't it be easier to walk away from learning, or put it off, if you don't see the fundamentals there at the start?
I don't know if these are great questions, I just wanted to let you know your post got my gears turning. Thanks!
- Patrick
Hi Michael,
ReplyDeleteGreat to see you here in my blog group! Looking forward to your recommended sites :)
Have a great weekend!